Tefel v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Tefel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

JOSEPH PAUL TEFEL, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:24-cv-02749-TPB-AEP

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,1

Defendant. /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 17). By the Motion, Plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees in the amount of $7,250.00 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”),

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(d). On March 27, 2025, this Court entered an Order reversing and remanding the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings (Doc. 14). Thereafter, the Clerk entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff (Doc. 15). As the prevailing party, Plaintiff now requests an award of attorney’s fees. See

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(d)(1)(A); cf. Shalala v. Schaefer,

509 U.S. 292

, 300–02 (1993)

1 Frank Bisignano is now the Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Commissioner Frank Bisignano should be substituted as the defendant in this matter. No further action needs to be taken to continue this matter by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security (concluding that a party who wins a sentence-four remand order under

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g) is a prevailing party), superseded by rule on other grounds, Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(c)(2)(B). After issuance of an order awarding EAJA fees, the United States Department of the Treasury will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If Plaintiff has no discernible federal debt, the government will accept Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel. The Commissioner does not oppose the requested relief (Doc. 17, at 2). Additionally, Plaintiff's attorney filed time records and declarations in support of the motion (Docs. 17-1, 17-2). Therefore, for the reasons set out in Plaintiff's motion and supported by the declarations, it is hereby RECOMMENDED: 1. Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 17) be GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff be awarded fees in the amount of $7,250.00. Unless the Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff owes a federal debt, the government must pay the fees and costs to Plaintiffs counsel in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment (Doc. 17-4). IT IS SO REPORTED in Tampa, Florida, on this Ist day of July 2025.

A ee | oe TV) ANTHON E. PORCELLI cc: Counsel of Record United Sfates Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO PARTIES A party has fourteen days from the date they are served a copy of this report

to file written objections to this report’s proposed findings and recommendations or to seek an extension of the fourteen-day deadline to file written objections.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C). A party’s failure to file written objections waives that party’s right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-

1;

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). Should the parties wish to expedite the resolution of this matter, they may promptly file a joint notice of no objection.

cc: Hon. Thomas P. Barber Counsel of Record

Reference

Status
Unknown