Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc. v. Six M's II, LLC d/b/a Chrysler of Lawrenceburg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 24-61760-CIV-DIMITROULEAS FIDELITY WARRANTY SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. SIX M’S II, LLC, d/b/a, CHRYSLER OF LAWRENCEBURG, and MARCUS D. WITHERS, Defendants. ___________________________________/

. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Bill of Costs [DE 59]; and the September 2, 2025 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt [DE 61] (the “Report”). The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 61] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 61] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993).

Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 61] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusions.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 61] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Bill of Costs [DE 59] is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff is entitled to the costs in the amount of $5,208.24.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 17th day of September, 2025.

f a ? ; 2 (F a “4 if { FO etre zd a3 v ty j ‘4 ta ase Af VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies furnished to: Counsel of record