ADAMS v. BEACH
ADAMS v. BEACH
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
DEMETRICK JARRED ADAMS,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 3:25-cv-1389-TKW-HTC
RANDALL BEACH,
Defendant. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations.1 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. This case is DISMISSED because it is time-barred.
1 Based on this conclusion, the Court need not consider whether Plaintiff’s claim is also barred by Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477(1994). 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file. DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of October, 2025.
To po Wed © T. KENT WETHERELL, I UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Demetrick Jarred Adams v. Randall Beach
- Status
- Unknown