Noel Castro v. Lee County Jail

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Noel Castro v. Lee County Jail

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

NOEL CASTRO

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:25-cv-1032-SPC-NPM

LEE COUNTY JAIL,

Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Noel Castro’s Complaint (Doc. 1). Castro is a pretrial detainee in Lee County Jail and a defendant in a pending state criminal case, and he sues Lee County under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. Castro is proceeding in forma pauperis, so the Court must review the Complaint sua sponte to determine whether it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks monetary damages against a party who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Castro is awaiting trial for lewd or lascivious molestation.1 He claims an affidavit signed by the alleged victim proves his innocence, and he accuses Lee County of negligently ignoring the case, which has disrupted his life. The state court docket shows that a pretrial conference is set for December 3, 2025.

1 The Court takes judicial notice of the online docket for Lee County Circuit Court Case No. 24-CF-521. This is not the proper venue for Castro to challenge his ongoing criminal case. Federal courts are not intended as a “pre-trial motion forum for state

prisoners.” Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Ky.,

410 U.S. 484, 493

(1973). Further, principles of equity, comity, and federalism require the Court to abstain from interfering in state criminal proceedings. See Younger v. Harris,

401 U.S. 37, 45

(1971). Castro provides no reason for this Court to

overlook the abstention principle. Nor does he allege any facts that warrant application of any exception to the Younger doctrine. Castro will have an opportunity to contest his guilt in the upcoming trial. If he is convicted, he may collaterally attack any resulting incarceration by

filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus after exhausting his claims in state court. But he may not preemptively litigate his guilt or challenge the state’s prosecution of his case in a § 1983 claim. The Court will dismiss this action, and because amendment would be futile, close this case.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Plaintiff Noel Castro’s Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, enter judgment,

and close this case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on November 14, 2025.

tit WOblatet he UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SA: FTMP-1 Copies: All Parties of Record

Reference

Status
Unknown