James Laughridge v. Brandon Stahl, Courtney Parenti, Joseph Lundy and John Doe
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
James Laughridge v. Brandon Stahl, Courtney Parenti, Joseph Lundy and John Doe
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
JAMES LAUGHRIDGE,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No: 6:25-cv-2126-CEM-LHP
BRANDON STAHL, COURTNEY PARENTI, JOSEPH LUNDY and JOHN DOE,
Defendants
ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Early Discovery to Identify John Doe Defendant. On review, the motion is DENIED without prejudice for failure to provide a memorandum of law as required by Local Rule 3.01(b). Specifically, the motion fails to demonstrate, with citation to legal authority, why plaintiff is entitled to the early discovery he seeks. See Moon v. Newsome,
863 F.2d 835, 837(11th Cir. 1989) (a pro se litigant “is subject to the relevant law and rules of court, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”), cert. denied,
493 U.S. 863(1989). DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on December 8, 2025.
ayn □□□□ LESLIE AN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
fy
Reference
- Status
- Unknown