James Laughridge v. Brandon Stahl, Courtney Parenti, Joseph Lundy and John Doe

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

James Laughridge v. Brandon Stahl, Courtney Parenti, Joseph Lundy and John Doe

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

JAMES LAUGHRIDGE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 6:25-cv-2126-CEM-LHP

BRANDON STAHL, COURTNEY PARENTI, JOSEPH LUNDY and JOHN DOE,

Defendants

ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Early Discovery to Identify John Doe Defendant. On review, the motion is DENIED without prejudice for failure to provide a memorandum of law as required by Local Rule 3.01(b). Specifically, the motion fails to demonstrate, with citation to legal authority, why plaintiff is entitled to the early discovery he seeks. See Moon v. Newsome,

863 F.2d 835, 837

(11th Cir. 1989) (a pro se litigant “is subject to the relevant law and rules of court, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”), cert. denied,

493 U.S. 863

(1989). DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on December 8, 2025.

ayn □□□□ LESLIE AN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties

fy

Reference

Status
Unknown