Olga Rosa Acosta v. Social Security Administration

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 25-23879-CIV-DIMITROULEAS-ELFENBEIN OLGA ROSA ACOSTA, Plaintiff, vs. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; CLOSING CASE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the December 16, 2025, Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein (the “Report”) [DE 7]. Therein, Judge Elfenbein, upon sua sponte review of the record, recommends dismissal of the action based upon Plaintiff’s failure to pay a filing fee, the denial of her IFP application, and her failure, twice, to timely submit a Long Form IFP motion as permitted by the court.

The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 7] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 7] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993).

The Court has also conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 7] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 7] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case and DENY any pending motions as moot.

3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to MAIL a copy of this Order to the address below.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 6th day of January, 2026.

y. Off, } ii As j if fas ae? A VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies to: Counsel of record Magistrate Judge Elfenbein Olga Rosa Acosta 9898 NW 126 Terrace Hialeah Gardens, FL 33018 PRO SE