United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, 2026

Veniko Marquel Byrd v. Woodrow Kerce and Steven Outlaw

Veniko Marquel Byrd v. Woodrow Kerce and Steven Outlaw
United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida · Decided January 9, 2026
Veniko Marquel Byrd v. Woodrow Kerce and Steven Outlaw

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION VENIKO MARQUEL BYRD, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 4:25-cv-362-TKW-MJF WOODROW KERCE and STEVEN OUTLAW, Defendants. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9). No objections were filed.

Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's determination that this case should be dismissed based on Plaintiff's failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history as required by the court-mandated complaint form. See McNair v. Johnson, 141 F.4th 1301, 1308 (11th Cir. 2025). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED under the Court’s inherent authority based on Plaintiff's failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history.

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of January, 2026.

T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.