United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 2026

Ayatollah Hylton v. Chivone Janee Hylton, et al.

Ayatollah Hylton v. Chivone Janee Hylton, et al.
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida · Decided January 21, 2026
Ayatollah Hylton v. Chivone Janee Hylton, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 25-CV-62206-WPD AYATOLLAH HYLTON, Plaintiff, v. CHIVONE JANEE HYLTON, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ OMNIBUS ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Omnibus Report and Recommendation on Pending Motions (the “Report”) [DE 96], issued by Magistrate Judge Augustin-Birch on January 5, 2026. [DE 96]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 96] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 96] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993).

Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 96] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 96] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 60] is GRANTED and the remaining Motions to Dismiss [DE 80; DE 82; DE 83; DE 90; DE 94] are DENIED AS MOOT.

3. The Amended Complaint [DE 21-1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO AMEND.1 4. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Final Judgment against Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation [DE 62] is DENIED.

5. Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation’s Motion to Set Aside Clerk’s Entry of Default and for Sanctions Against Plaintiff [DE 59] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Clerk’s entry of default against Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation [DE 55] is SET ASIDE.

6. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike [DE 66] is DENIED.

7. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Final Judgment against Defendant Budget Notary Services, Inc. [DE 76] is DENIED.

8. The Clerk’s entry of default against Defendant Michael H. Johnson [DE 88] is SET ASIDE.

9. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant Michael H. Johnson’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 91] is DENIED.

10. This case remains REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Augustin-Birch.

1 The Court notes that Plaintiff has already filed a Second Amended Complaint [DE 98] on January 9, 2026, prior to the expiration of the objection period to Judge Augustin-Birch’s Report and Recommendation [DE 96].

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 21st day of January, 2026.

“4 if { FO etre zd VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies furnished to: Counsel of record and pro se parties Magistrate Judge Augustin-Birch

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.