Starmark Financial, LLC v. Luther Appliance & Furniture Sales Acquisition LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 24-CV-62357-WPD STARMARK FINANCIAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LUTHER APPLIANCE & FURNITURE SALES ACQUISITION LLC, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) [DE 76], issued by Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt on February 10, 2026. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 76] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 76] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993).

Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 76] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 76] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Garnishment Judgment [DE 72] is GRANTED.

The Court will enter a separate final garnishment judgment.

3. The Motion for Disposition and Entry of Garnishment Judgment or Motion to Eliminate or Reduce Time for Objecting to R&R [DE 79] is DENIED AS MOOT.

4. This case remains CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 25th day of February, 2026.

: “4 if % f ? f tne i ye Zo #4 v Paty 4 ‘4 ase Af VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies furnished to: Magistrate Judge Hunt Counsel of record