United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 2026

Francisco Ruben Ramos Gomez v. Charles Parra

Francisco Ruben Ramos Gomez v. Charles Parra
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida · Decided March 17, 2026
Francisco Ruben Ramos Gomez v. Charles Parra

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 1:26-cv-20657-LEIBOWITZ FRANCISCO RUBEN RAMOS GOMEZ, Petitioner, v. CHARLES PARRA, Respondent. ______________________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed on January 30, 2026. [See ECF No. 1 ¶ 6]. On February 27, 2026, the Court directed Respondent to show cause as to why Petitioner should not receive an individualized bond hearing, or be released. [ECF No. 5]. On March 2, 2026, Respondent filed a Notice of Appearance [ECF No. 6], followed by a Response to the Court’s Show Cause Order [ECF No. 7] (the “Response”), filed on March 7, 2026. In the Response, Respondent “incorporate[d] by reference, the legal arguments it presented in Ocampo Fernandez v. Ripa, No. 25-24981-CIV-LEIBOWITZ, ECF No. (S.D. Fla. Nov. 25, 2025) . . . to conserve judicial and party resources while expediting the Court’s consideration of this case.” [ECF No. 7 at 1].

After extensive legal analysis in Ocampo Fernandez, this Court granted the petitioner’s petition in part and denied it in part, ordering the respondent to provide the petitioner with an individualized bond hearing consistent with 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). After due consideration, the Court hereby adopts the reasoning set forth in Ocampo Fernandez and orders the same relief in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Petition [ECF No. Ij is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. ‘The Petition 1s granted on Count IT.

2. Respondent shall provide Petitioner an individualized bond hearing, consistent with 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), within seven (7) days of this Order, or otherwise release Petitioner. ' 3. Respondent shall file a notice with the Court on or before April 1, 2026, confirming and detailing its compliance with this Order.

4. Count I of the Petition [ECF No. 1 4 39-42] is DISMISSED without prejudice.

5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 17, 2026.

® DAVID S. LEIBOWITZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ce: counsel of record ' Other courts that have granted habeas corpus petitions on this precise issue have given much less time to provide the petitioner a bond hearing. See, ag, Perez, No. 25-24820-CV, ECF No. 9 at 11 (two days); Gonzalez, 2025 WL 3145764, at *10 (three days); Lopex-Campos, 2025 WL 2496379, at *10 (seven days); Gomes, 2025 WL 1869299, at *9 (ten days). However, consistent with Petitioner’s request for a bond hearing within seven days of this Court’s Order [ECF No. 1 at 9], the Court will give Respondent seven days to comply.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.