East Coast Assemblers, Inc. v. Baltazar Nuñez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 24-80090-CIV-DIMITROULEAS EAST COAST ASSEMBLERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BALTAZAR NUÑEZ, Defendant. /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant’s Amended Motion for Bill of Costs [DE 223]; and the March 11, 2026 Report and Recommendation on Defendant’s Amended Motion for Bill of Costs, entered by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman [DE 228] (the “Report”). The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 228] have been filed, and the extended time for filing such objections has passed, see [DE 230] (extending objection period to April 10, 2026).

As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 228] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993).

Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 228] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusions.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 228] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Defendant’s Amended Motion for Bill of Costs [DE 223] is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff shall pay Defendant costs in the amount of $21,339.72.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 13th day of April, 2026. fl } “a 4 : “4 if % f ? f tne i ye Zo #4 v Paty 4 ‘4 ase Af VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS Copies furnished to: United States District Judge Counsel of Record Hon. William Matthewman, US Mag. Judge