James Villaroel v. Shade Tucker, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 25-62489-CIV-SINGHAL/STRAUSS JAMES VILLAROEL, Plaintiff, v. SHADE TUCKER, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Strauss’s Report and Recommendation, wherein he recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (DE [7]). “When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes; see also, e.g., Sully v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2024 WL 1857456, at *8 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 29, 2024) (Altman, J.) (same); Stephen v. United States, 2016 WL 9649870, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Mar.

29, 2016) (Cohn, J.) (same). Having reviewed the Complaint (DE [1]) and the Report and Recommendation (DE [7]), the Court discerns no clear error. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that 1. The Report and Recommendation (DE [7]) is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (DE [1]) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3. Should Plaintiff desire to re-assert his claims, he must file a separate action under a new case number and notify the Clerk that the new lawsuit is related to this one; 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case, CANCEL all deadlines and hearings, and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 22nd day of April 2026. \ Ss UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished counsel via CM/ECF