Ricardo Tyrone Mitchell v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. and Vista BMW Coconut...
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 25-CV-62441-STRAUSS
RICARDO TYRONE MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC. and VISTA BMW COCONUT CREEK, Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND REQUIRING CONFERRAL THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Fourth Amended Complaint [DE 25] (the “Motion”). For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Motion fails to comply with the Court’s local rules because it does not contain a certificate of conferral. See S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(a)(3) (detailing conferral requirements); see also S.D. Fla. L.R. 1.1 (explaining “counsel” as used in local rules shall be construed to apply to pro se parties). The Court separately observes that the proposed amendment fails to state a claim because it is a “shotgun pleading.” See Weiland v. Palm Beach Cnty. Sheriff’s Off., 792 F.3d 1313, 1320- (11th Cir. 2015) (describing characteristics of “shotgun pleadings”); Weil v. Phillips, 816 F. App’x 339
Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion [DE 25] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJDUCE.
2. At the same conferral required under my prior order dated April 20, 2026, see [DE 24] at 4, the parties shall confer regarding Plaintiff’s desire to file an amended complaint and the impact any such amendment would have on the other issues to be discussed at the status conference set for April 29, 2026.
DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 23rd day of April 2026.
United States Magistrate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.