Reed v. Storr
Opinion of the Court
These consolidated cases were duly tried by the court. By a stipulation of counsel, the parties offered all of their evidence on the sole issue as to whether or not the defendant’s automobile was being driven with his knowledge and consent at the time of the collision. It was agreed that the court shall thereupon make a determination of this issue, and if favorable to the plaintiffs, other evidence would be presented on the matter of negligence and damages, and if not favorable to the plaintiffs, a final judgment would be entered. It was further agreed, however, that in the event of a motion for a new trial, or such judgment be reversed, then the parties should have an opportunity to present evidence on the remaining issues of the cause.
The undisputed, evidence offered by both parties shows that the driver of the defendant’s car at the time of the collision, had on one previous occasion, with the knowledge and consent of the defendant, driven the car to a nearby community so this defendant could obtain certain medical services. After the trip the car was parked adjoining the house of the defendant, and the key left in the car.
As I view the law, the facts as above outlined do not warrant a finding that the' car at the time of the accident was driven with the consent or knowledge, express or implied, of the defendant.
Thereupon, it is ordered that on the issue of knowledge and consent of the defendant, the court finds for the defendant; that, subject to the stipulations above stated, the plaintiffs take nothing • by their complaints, and that the defendants go hence without day; all with costs taxed against the plaintiffs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.