Pierce v. J. M. Brunswick & Balk Co.
Pierce v. J. M. Brunswick & Balk Co.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court:
The appellants assign some six different grounds of error upon which they ask a reversal of the decree made by the court below, only one of which this court deems it necessary to consider, and that is the first, which is that the complainant had no such case as entitled it to relief in a court of equity against them or either of them. There is nothing alleged by appellants against the mortgage, its execution, its record, or that the mortgage debt was actually due and •owing. The only question for this court to consider is the validity of the tax sale made by GTeo. A. Patton, on the 5th day of May, 1884, of the billiard table embraced in said mortgage and under an assessment for State and county taxes for the year 1883. This assessment, as appears from
The decree of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions to dismiss the bill as to Patton and Pierce, unless the complainant makes application to amend the same.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Alton Pierce and George A. Patton v. J. M. Brunswick and Balk Co.
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- When B. holds a mortgage on pt>rsonal property that is assessed for State and county taxes as the property of the mortgagor and is sold to pay the taxes so assessed, and B. flies his bill to set aside said sale, charging collusion, fraud and combination between the-mortgagor, the collector of revenue and the purchaser of the-property at said sale to make said sale in order to relieve said property of the mortgage lien, and the collector and purchaser answer said bill aud deny all fraud, collusion and improper action on their part to effect said sale, and the case is here upon bill, exhibits, answer and general replication, the bill should b& dismissed as to the collector of revenue and the purchaser at said! sale.