Sauls v. Freeman
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- State, Ex Rel. Neafie v. Butler (Fla. 1942)
- Sherwood v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. City of Miami (Fla. 1943)
- Mann v. Etchells (Fla. 1938)
- Herbert H. Pape, Inc. v. Finch (Fla. 1931)
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of Lakeland (Fla. 1927)
- Texas Co. v. Davidson (Fla. 1918)
- Florida Land Rock Phosphate Co. v. Anderson (Fla. 1905)
- Suwannee & San Pedro Railroad v. West Coast Railway Co. (Fla. 1905)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The petition for a rehearing filed in this cause has been considered. It suggests nothing that had not been carefully considered by ns in reaching the conclusions set forth in the main opinion.
In so far as the petition is a reargnment or assumes any new ground or position not taken before, it is clearly in violation of Supreme Court Rule 21, and the practice of this court, as has been settled by the adjudications. Smith vs. Croom, 7 Fla., 180; First Nat. Bank vs. Ashmead, 2 So. Reptr., 665; s. c. 23 Fla., 379.
A rehearing is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.