Wall v. Shelley
Wall v. Shelley
Opinion of the Court
The appellants filed a bill against J. H. Shelley, as •sheriff of Putnam county, and M. I. Coxe, for the purpose of enjoining the sheriff from setting aside certain ■personal properly claimed by Coxe as exempt to him as the head of a family residing in this State, and which had been seized by virtue of a distress warrant issued at the instance of appellants against Coxe and •wife. The bill shows that appellants had rented to 'Coxe and wife a hotel situated in Palatka, Florida, for .a specified money rental, and that being in arrear for
There is here neither assignment of error nor brief of counsel on the part of appellants, and we consider the case as entirely abandoned by them. Under this view we will affirm the decree appealed from (Clarke vs. Southern Express Co., 33 Fla. 617, 15 South. Rep. 252; Thomas vs. State, 36 Fla. 109, 18 South. Rep. 331), and an order will be entered accordingly.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- R. L. Wall et ux. v. J. H. Shelley, Sheriff
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Where there is no assignment of errors, or brief filed on the part of appellant, the case will be considered as entirely abandoned, and the decree appealed from affirmed.