Carmichael v. Bluthenthal

Supreme Court of Florida June 15, 1898

Carmichael v. Bluthenthal, 40 Fla. 550 (Fla. 1898)

Opinion of the Court

*551Decision

Per Curiam.

*550This action was brought by the defendants in error, as plaintiffs in attachment against the plaintiffs in error, as claimants, and Thomas V. Culverhouse, defendant. *551There was judgment for the plaintiffs, and the claimants take writ of error. The judgment is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name: G. A. Carmichael and Columbus Carmichael, partners under the firm name and style of G. A. Carmichael & Son, in Error v. Francis Bluthenthal and Monroe L. Bickart, copartners doing business under firm name of Bluthenthal & Bickart, in Error
Status: Published