National Bank v. Newheart
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Brown, Et Ux. v. City of Palatka (Fla. 1938)
- Walker Fert. Co., Inc. v. Race (Fla. 1936)
- Brooks v. Miami Bank & Trust Co. (Fla. 1934)
- Clark v. Rosenwald (N.M. 1924)
- Lessic ex rel. Floyd v. Booske (Fla. 1923)
- Vincent v. Hines (Fla. 1920)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This cause coining on for adjudication upon a rehearing thereof heretofore granted, and it appearing to the court that the decree appealed from is a joint decree against the only appellant before the court and several others who are- not made parties to the appeal except by the use of the abbreviation “et al.,” which is ineffectual, and that said several omitted parties are necessary parties appellant,.and can not now be brought in as parties appellant because the time has expired in which they can take an appeal, it is, therefore, ordered that the appeal in said cause be, and the same is, hereby dismissed. State ex rel. Andreu v. Canfield, 40 Fla. 36, 23 South. Rep. 591; Cornell v. Franklin, 40 Fla. 149, 23 South. Rep. 589; Whitlock v. Willard, 18 Fla. 156; Castleman v. Holmes, 7 T. B. Mon. (Ky.) 591.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.