Cator v. Emanuel

Supreme Court of Florida
Cator v. Emanuel, 42 Fla. 385 (Fla. 1900)

Cator v. Emanuel

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This cause being now reached for final adjudication in its regular order upon the docket, and it appearing to the court that the appeal entered therein is returnable to the January term, A. D. 1896, of this court, and the appellants and their counsel having failed to file any abstracts of the record as required by rule No. 20 of this court, adopted September 16th, 1895, the said appeal is hereby dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robinson W. Cator, William H. J. Walters, William H. Pagon, J. McKenney White, James H. Cator, Franklin P. Cator and George Cator, co-partners doing business under the firm name of Armstrong, Cator & Company v. Maurice Emanuel, and Adams J. Corbett as Assignee of Maurice Emanuel
Status
Published
Syllabus
Appellate Practice — Failure to File Abstract of Record — Dismissal. Where there is a total failure to file abstracts of the record, as required by rule 20 of this court, as adopted September 16, 1895, the appeal will be dismissed.