Marsh v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Florida
Marsh v. Bennett, 46 Fla. 241 (Fla. 1903)

Marsh v. Bennett

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on for final adjudication before Division A of the court upon the transcript of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, upon due consideration the court finds that there was no final judgment rendered in said cause from which writ of error would lie, and it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the writ of error in said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error. Harrison v. Thurston, 11 Fla. 307; Gates v. Hayner, 22 Fla. 325; Ropes v. Eldridge, 39 Fla. 47, 21. South. Rep. 570.

Reference

Full Case Name
Reubin Marsh, in Error v. Porter S. Bennett, M. S. Merrill and E. T. Merrill, in Error
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Appellate Practice — Final Judgment Necessary to Support Writ oe Error. Where the record brought to an appellate court by writ of error shows that there was no final judgment in the cause from which such writ would lie, the said writ of error will be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error.