Supreme Court of Florida, 1911

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Aultman

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided January 15, 1911 · Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield

61 Fla. 198

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Parrish v. State (Fla. 1943)
Pavlis v. Atlas-Imperial Diesel Engine Co. (Fla. 1937)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*199On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Tlie court did not overlook any oí the contentions of the plaintiff in error. A single motion to vacate a judgment by default and to allow the filing of pleas tendered with the motion was denied by the trial court; and as no showing was made for vacating the default judgment the denial of the motion was proper, especially where the pleas are defective. See Garlington v. Priest, 13 Fla., 559; Benedict v. W. T. Hadlow, 52 Fla., 188, 42 South. Rep., 239, Hocker v. Forrester, 53 Fla. 392, 43 South. Rep., 241.

A rehearing is denied.

Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford and Cockrell, J. J. concur; Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, J. J., concur in the opinion. .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.