Supreme Court of Florida, 1911

Strouse & Bros. v. Hall

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided June 15, 1911 · Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield

62 Fla. 394

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Martin v. Hosmer (Fla. 1929)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

— It appears from the transcript that during the trial of the cause the plaintiff announced that on account of a ruling of the court, refusing to admit certain proffered documentary evidence, it would be compelled to take a non-suit. We find nothing in the transcript which even purports to be a final judgment, therefore there is nothing to support a writ of error. See Goldring v. Reid, 60 Fla. 78, 53 South. Rep. 503, where prior decisions of this court will be found cited.

There being no- final judgment, it necessarily follows that the writ of error must be dismissed.

*395Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford and Cockrell, J. J., concur; Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.