Supreme Court of Florida, 1911

Strouse & Bros. v. Hall

Strouse & Bros. v. Hall
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided June 15, 1911 · Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
62 Fla. 394

Strouse & Bros. v. Hall

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

— It appears from the transcript that during the trial of the cause the plaintiff announced that on account of a ruling of the court, refusing to admit certain proffered documentary evidence, it would be compelled to take a non-suit. We find nothing in the transcript which even purports to be a final judgment, therefore there is nothing to support a writ of error. See Goldring v. Reid, 60 Fla. 78, 53 South. Rep. 503, where prior decisions of this court will be found cited.

There being no- final judgment, it necessarily follows that the writ of error must be dismissed.

*395Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford and Cockrell, J. J., concur; Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.