Co-Operative Homestead Co. v. Dickman

Supreme Court of Florida
Co-Operative Homestead Co. v. Dickman, 68 Fla. 462 (Fla. 1914)
67 So. 140
Cockrell, Hocker, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield

Co-Operative Homestead Co. v. Dickman

Opinion of the Court

Cockrell, J.

This is an appeal from an order confirming a sale, consequent upon a. final decree in foreclosure. Nearly six months had elapsed between the entry of that order, and much more than six months after the final decree. All the assignments as argued, question the propriety of the final decree and interlocutory orders entered before that decree.

While an appeal from a final decree opens up all preceding orders, an appeal from a supplemental order merely carrying out that decree does not bring up the final decree. Judson Lumber Co. v. Patterson, decided this term.

*463Order affirmed.

Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Hocker and Whitfield, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Co-Operative Homestead Company, and Others v. Albert P. Dickman, Trustee
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Upon an appeal from an order confirming a sale, errors assigned upon the final decree will not be considered.