Mizell Live Stock Co. v. Pollard
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kight v. American Eagle Fire Insurance (Fla. 1938)
- Beckwith v. Bailey (Fla. 1935)
- Carney v. Stringfellow (Fla. 1917)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is a writ of error directed to the granting of a new trial.
The motion for a new trial contained several grounds which questioned the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and also claimed newly discovered evidence. The trial Judge simply granted the motion without specifying the ground upon which his order was based. We have examined the transcript of the record and are of the opinion that the order must be affirmed upon the authority of Ruff v. Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co., 67 Fla. 224, 64 South. Rep. 782, and Chancey v. Williams, 56 Fla. 215, 47 South. Rep. 811.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.