Schmids v. Tampa PubLishing Co.
Schmids v. Tampa PubLishing Co.
Opinion of the Court
—Schmids brought an action to recover damages for the alleged conversion of goods taken in attachment proceedings. The defendant pleaded the general issue and also special pleas, all of which latter were held bad on demurrer except one. Two of the replications to the remaining special plea were sustained on demurrer. The cause was tried by the court on a stipulation as to the facts. There was judgment for the defendant. No motion for new trial was made. The plaintiff took writ of error. The only assignment of
The judgment, considered with reference to the pleadings, does not appear to be erroneous.
Judgment affirmed.
All concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- William Schmids, in Error v. Tampa Publishing Company, a Corporation, in Error
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Where no motion for new trial is made in the lower court, the appellate court will not consider assignments of error based on the probative force of the evidence.