Makinson v. Mach

Supreme Court of Florida
Makinson v. Mach, 80 Fla. 772 (Fla. 1920)
86 So. 847
Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield

Makinson v. Mach

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and' the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and' the same is hereby, affirmed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield and West, J. J., concur. Ellis, J., dissents.

Reference

Full Case Name
W. H. Makinson, John S. Cadel and C. L. Bandy, as Trustees Kissimmee Lodge No. 1485, Loyal Order of Moose of the World v. Ernest Mach and Emil Mach, Co-partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Mach Brothers
Status
Published