McRae v. Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
McRae v. Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Co., 81 Fla. 114 (Fla. 1921)
87 So. 320; 1921 Fla. LEXIS 540

McRae v. Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said Decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
C. E. McRae, L. W. Whitehurst, S. P. Durrance, W. M. Whitten and Sears Coker, as and Constituting the Board of County Commissioners for DeSoto County, Florida, and Cyril Baldwin, as Tax Collector of DeSoto County, and J. L. Dishong, as Sheriff of DeSoto County, Florida v. Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Company, a Corporation
Status
Published