Mizell v. City of Tampa

Supreme Court of Florida
Mizell v. City of Tampa, 81 Fla. 291 (Fla. 1921)
87 So. 784

Mizell v. City of Tampa

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the ' Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, Whitfield and West, J. J., concur.

Browne, C. J., and Ellis, J., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
Joseph Mizell and Wife, Fannie Mizelle, and M. B. Macfarlane and Wife, Mary A. Macfarlane v. City of Tampa, a Municipal Corporation
Status
Published