City of Gainesville v. Haymans

Supreme Court of Florida
City of Gainesville v. Haymans, 81 Fla. 403 (Fla. 1921)
88 So. 128

City of Gainesville v. Haymans

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of *404its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that’there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
City of Gainesville, in Error v. J. J. Haymans, T. F. Thomas, J. W. McDowell, J. C. Bishop, W. M. Pepper, James Doig, Maggie Carter, J. A. Robertson, C. S. Robertson, Emma Robertson, Eva Robertson, Margaret E. Robertson, Gertrude McIntosh, and Fullwood McIntosh, in Error
Status
Published