Dawkins v. Lainhart

Supreme Court of Florida
Dawkins v. Lainhart, 82 Fla. 376 (Fla. 1921)
90 So. 160

Dawkins v. Lainhart

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
D. C. Dawkins and J. R. Hill, partners doing business under the firm name and style of Dawkins-Hill Construction Company, and Maryland Casualty Company, a Corporation, in Error v. George W. Lainhart, George W. Potter and E. W. Bunker, partners doing business under the firm name and style of Lake Worth Lumber Company, in Error
Status
Published