Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29 (Fla. 1922)
90 So. 621

Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In an action for- personal injuries, judgment was rendered for the defendant on a demurrer to the declaration and plaintiff took writ .of error. The declaration is needlessly prolix, but as the allegations do not by repugnance- destroy each other, and as the declaration does not wholly fail to state a cause of action,- the demurrer should have been overruled. See Catts v. Henderson, 81 Fla. 138, 87 South. Rep. 313; Florida East *30Coast Ry. Co. v. City of Miami, Fla. 80 Fla. 329, 86 South. Rep. 308. Admiralty is not involved. 254 U. S. 242.

Reversed.

All concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
J. W. Peterson, in Error v. Oscar Daniels Company, a Corporation, in Error
Cited By
11 cases
Status
Published