Taylor v. Betts Naval Stores Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
Taylor v. Betts Naval Stores Co., 83 Fla. 242 (Fla. 1922)
91 So. 126

Taylor v. Betts Naval Stores Co.

070rehearing

On Rehearing.

A petition for rehearing herein having been considered and it appearing that the defendant below having participated as a marker in the establishment of the road in question and having leased lands that were accessible by means of the use of the road, he is estopped from asserting a right to obstruct the road, and the injunctional orders appealed from and affirmed were proper, therefore a rehearing is denied.

All concur.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the orders aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there *243is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby, affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
S. V. D. Taylor v. Betts Naval Stores Company, a Corporation
Status
Published