Supreme Court of Florida, 1922

Dinkins v. Whiteside

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided July 3, 1922 · Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield

84 Fla. 81; 92 So. 688

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Howarth, Et Ux. v. City of Deland (Fla. 1934)
Oakland Properties Corp. v. Hogan (Fla. 1928)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam

An amended bill of complaint herein brought to have a judgment canceled and to enjoin its enforcement on the ground, among others, that the debt, for which the judgment was rendered had been paid, was held insufficient on a general demurrer, and complainant appealed.

*82As the allegations of the bill of complaint that are admitted by the demurrer do ,not wholly fail to state a case for equitable relief the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. Wells v. Williams, 80 Fla. 498, 86 South. Rep. 336; Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. City of Miami, 80 Fla. 329, 86 South. Rep. 208.

Reversed.

Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur. Browne, C. J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.