Supreme Court of Florida, 1923

Hogan v. State ex rel. Williams

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided January 9, 1923 · Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield

85 Fla. 27; 95 So. 617

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Hogan v. State ex rel. Williams (Fla. 1923)
State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Gray (Fla. 1946)
Damguard v. Tunnicliffe (Fla. 1928)
State ex rel. Buford v. Daniel (Fla. 1924)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is 'a proceeding in mandamus. It is brought to this- court by writ of error. After return to the alternative writ had been made an attorney was appointed by order of the court to take the testimony of witnesses and report same to the court. Pursuant to- this order testimony was taken as if it were a chancery cause. There is no bill *28of exceptions in the record but the record contains what purports to be a copy of the evidence. The motion to strike the pages of the record containing this evidence should be granted. ■ '

The motion to strike is granted.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne and West, J. J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.