Haymans ex rel. McEachin v. Haymans

Supreme Court of Florida
Haymans ex rel. McEachin v. Haymans, 86 Fla. 110 (Fla. 1923)
97 So. 320; 1923 Fla. LEXIS 356
Terrell, West, Whitfield

Haymans ex rel. McEachin v. Haymans

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court.upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Towles vs. Roundtree, 10 Fla. 299, Taylor v. Everett 60 Fla. 362, 52 So. 980.

Whitfield, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
J. J. Haymans, Jr., Alvin Haymans and Gladys Haymans, Minors, by their next friend, T. C. McEachin and Isabelle Haymans, and T. C. McEachin, Isabelle Haymans and Lonnie Haymans, as Administrators of the Estate of J. J. Haymans v. Elonza Haymans (Better Known as Lonnie Haymans) and Hoyt Haymans
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published