Flowers v. Merritt
Flowers v. Merritt
Opinion of the Court
This is an application for writ of habeas corpus, addressed to the judges of the Circuit Court of Duval County, Florida. Upon consideration of the application on the 6th day of March, A. D. 1923, Honorable George Couper Gibbs, one of the judges of the court, made the following order:
“This matter coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge of this court upon petition for writ of habeas
“Ordered, adjudged and decreed that said prayer of said petitioner for the issuance of said writ be and it is hereby denied and said petition is hereby dismissed.”
To review this order writ of error was allowed and taken from this court.
The making of this order is assigned as error.
It is urged by counsel for plaintiff in error that the refusal of the writ was a gross abuse of judicial discretion. The Attorney General submits with his brief certified copy of an indictment returned by a grand jury of the Circuit Court in and for Columbia County on the 25th
In this State of the case the question of whether there was error in the order of the Judge of the Fourth Judicial Circuit denying the writ prayed is immaterial, the question having become moot because of subsequent proceedings and final disposition of the ease materially changing the status of the person in whose behalf the application for the writ was made.
The writ of error is therefore dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Catherine Flowers, for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Leo McGowan, in Error v. R. E. Merritt, as Sheriff of Duval County, Florida, in Error
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Where in habeas corpus proceedings it is made to appear from developments subsequent to the suing out of a writ of error, materially changing the status of the person in whose behalf the application for writ of habeas corpus was made, that nothing would be accomplished by a' consideration of the cause on the merits, the writ of error will be dismissed.