Hatter v. Barlow

Supreme Court of Florida
Hatter v. Barlow, 86 Fla. 637 (Fla. 1924)
Terrell, West, Whitfield

Hatter v. Barlow

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from interlocutory orders sustaining demurrers of amended bills of complaint.

Upon full consideration of the record, it appears that the amended bills of complaint do not wholly fail to state an equity in favor of- the complainants, therefore the general demurrers to the amended bills ,of complaint should not have been sustained.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Walter Hatter and R. E. Evans v. Ames A. Barlow, Celinda F. Barlow, Albert L. McGlaun, G. N. Hendry, Mabel L. Mead, Albert L. McGlaun, Trustee, Ames A. Barlow, Trustee, John W. Pinkerton, Robert B. Holmes, R. E. Evans, George H. Bruen and Brevard County State Bank, a Corporation
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published