Pero v. Corley

Supreme Court of Florida
Pero v. Corley, 87 Fla. 448 (Fla. 1924)
100 So. 748
Terrell, West, Whitfield

Pero v. Corley

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. See Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270; Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621.

The judgment rendered on the demurrer is reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur..

Reference

Full Case Name
Lucile Pero, in Error v. Charles J. Corley, in Error
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published