Supreme Court of Florida, 1924

Colman v. Macha

Colman v. Macha
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided May 31, 1924
87 Fla. 529; 100 So. 796

Colman v. Macha

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice West are of the opinion that the *530judgment rendered by the trial court to which the writ of error is addressed should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Browne and Mr. Justice Terrell are of the opinion that said judgment should be reversed; and, there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the judgment should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 South. Rep. 380; and State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, decided at this term.

An order will be entered affirming the judgment herein.

All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.