Campbell v. City of Marianna

Supreme Court of Florida
Campbell v. City of Marianna, 106 So. 352 (Fla. 1925)
90 Fla. 522
Whitpield, Strum, Brown

Campbell v. City of Marianna

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This' cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of'Counsel for the respective parties, and the record having'been seen-and inspected, and the court being now advised' of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and! adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circiiit Cburt' be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. ■

Whitpield, P: J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., Concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
McKinnon A. D. Campell, Doing Business as Jackson County Abstract Company, Appellant, v. the City of Marianna, a Municipal Corporation, and II. A. Hampton, City Marshal and Tax Collector of Said City, Respondent
Status
Published