Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Florida Citrus Exchange

Supreme Court of Florida February 14, 1925

Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Florida Citrus Exchange, 103 So. 607 (Fla. 1925)

89 Fla. 112

Whitfield, West, Terrell, Taylor, Ellis, Browne

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon a full consideration it appears that the evidence herein, taken as an entir.ety, does not fairly sustain the amount of damages awarded by the judgment; •therefore a new trial should be granted, a remittitur not "being deemed appropriate.

Eeversed.

*113 Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur. Taylor, C. J., and Ellis and Browne, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name: Seaboard Air Line Railway Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Florida Citrus Exchange, a Corporation, Defendant in Error
Status: Published