McCaskill v. First National Bank of Florala

Supreme Court of Florida
McCaskill v. First National Bank of Florala, 104 So. 863 (Fla. 1925)
90 Fla. 18
West, Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Strum

McCaskill v. First National Bank of Florala

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of judgment herein, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

West, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Strum, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
R. E. L. McCaskill and J. W. Brooks, Plaintiffs in Error, v. First National Bank of Florala, a Corporation, Defendant in Error
Status
Published