Stokely v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Florida
Stokely v. First National Bank, 106 So. 793 (Fla. 1926)
91 Fla. 26
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford

Stokely v. First National Bank

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises,- it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudgd by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Hattie N. Stokely and W. R. Stokely, Her Husband, Appellants, v. the First National Bank of St. Augustine, a Corporation, Existing Under and by Virtue of the Laws of the United States of America, Appellees
Status
Published