Gant v. State

Supreme Court of Florida July 27, 1926

Gant v. State, 109 So. 446 (Fla. 1926)

92 Fla. 373

Whitfield, Terrell-, Buford, Brown, Ellis, Strum

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the offense of Breaking and Entering with intent to commit a Felony.

The record of the evidence has been examined and is found to be entirely insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. Neither does the record disclose the arraignment or plea of the defendant below.

The judgment is reversed.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell- and Buford, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur in the opinion. •

Reference

Full Case Name: Hugh Gant, Plaintiff in Error; v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Status: Published