Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota

Supreme Court of Florida November 30, 1926

Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota, 111 So. 892 (Fla. 1926)

92 Fla. 1018

Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Ellis, Strum, Brown

Opinion of the Court

*1019 Per Curiam.

The record in this canse has been examined and the motion to dismiss for lack of proper parties is granted on authority of Sherlock v. Couper, 43 Fla. 51, 29 South. Rep. 444; Bridges & Co. v. Carlton, 56 Fla. 843, 48 South. Rep. 46; Bate v. Cook, 89 Fla. 40, 103 South. Rep. 126; Armour Fertilizer Works v. N. G. Wade Inv. Co., — Fla. 105 South. Rep. 819.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name: D. C. Clarke, Appellant, v. Bank of Sarasota, a Corporation, Alice E. Faubel in Her Own Right and as Executrix of the Last Wlll and Testament of J. H. Faubel, Deceased, Appellees
Status: Published