Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Florida, 1926

Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota

Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided November 30, 1926 · Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Ellis, Strum, Brown
111 So. 892; 92 Fla. 1018 (Southern Reporter)

Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota

Opinion of the Court

*1019 Per Curiam.

The record in this canse has been examined and the motion to dismiss for lack of proper parties is granted on authority of Sherlock v. Couper, 43 Fla. 51, 29 South. Rep. 444; Bridges & Co. v. Carlton, 56 Fla. 843, 48 South. Rep. 46; Bate v. Cook, 89 Fla. 40, 103 South. Rep. 126; Armour Fertilizer Works v. N. G. Wade Inv. Co., — Fla. 105 South. Rep. 819.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑