Carnley v. Gilpin

Supreme Court of Florida
Carnley v. Gilpin, 106 So. 789 (Fla. 1926)
90 Fla. 909
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford

Carnley v. Gilpin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Lamar Carnley, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. E. Gilpin, Doing Business as Gilpin Mercantile Company, and Harry Kahn, Defendants in Error
Status
Published