Supreme Court of Florida, 1927

Barse v. Whaley

Barse v. Whaley
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided July 19, 1927 · Brown, Ellis, Strum
114 So. 319; 94 Fla. 295 (Southern Reporter)

Barse v. Whaley

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed upon authority of Farrell v. Forest Inv. Co., 73 Fla. 191, 74 South. Rep. 216; Davidson v. Collier, 75 Fla. 783, 78 South, Rep. 983; Smith v. O’Brien, 75 Fla. 252, 78 South. Rep. 13; Travis v. Travis, 81 Fla. 309, 87 South. Rep. 762.; Simpson v. First Nat. Bank of Pensacola, 74 Fla. 539, 77 South. Rep. 204; Burgess v. Wirt, 91 Fla. 425, 108 South. Rep. 169.

Affirmed

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.