Pelot v. Long

Supreme Court of Florida
Pelot v. Long, 114 So. 320 (Fla. 1927)
94 Fla. 613
Ellis, Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown, Buford

Pelot v. Long

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transeipt of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment, it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the *614 said judgment of tbe Circuit Court be, and tbe same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
John W. Pelot, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. M. Long, Defendant in Error
Status
Published